Showing posts with label Kenneth Branagh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kenneth Branagh. Show all posts

Thursday, January 22, 2026

Repeating the Past: "Dead Again" (1991)

Film noir movies love to explore the question of just how much hold the past has over us. Can a person ever outrun their past? Can they atone for past actions? Are we doomed to repeat our mistakes, or even the mistakes of others? Or can a person make new choices, a new life? Can someone put the past to rest, leaving them free to begin anew? 

Most noir stories lean toward the fatalistic, pessimistic side of these questions. From Out of the Past (1947) to Where the Sidewalk Ends (1950) to L.A. Confidential (1997), often a person’s past will catch up with them and mess up whatever they’re trying to do with their lives now, for good or evil. The 1991 film Dead Again plays with those same questions. A neo-noir with two mysteries and two romances, it boasts the best use of scissors as a weapon since Dial ‘M’ for Murder. And it explores the idea of two people trying to figure out if they’re doomed to repeat the past, or if they’re free to create new lives for themselves. 


Although I don’t believe in reincarnation myself, I find it a fun concept to explore in fiction. Dead Again begins when an amnesiac (Emma Thompson) appears at the gate of a charitable home for kids. The nuns who run the home take her in for a day or two, but she has terrifying nightmares, refuses to eat, and can’t talk. The nuns realize they can’t care for her and try to find someone who can. 

They turn to Mike Church (Kenneth Branagh), a private investigator who specializes in tracking down missing persons. They hope he can reverse his usual methods and find out where this missing woman belongs. She has nowhere to go, so he lets her stay at his apartment while he runs an ad with her picture in the paper and tries to find clues to who she might be. 


The first night she stays at his place, she has her terrifying nightmare again — a man leering over her and exclaiming, “These are for you!” while preparing to stab her with a pair of scissors. The man in her dream looks like Mike Church, only with a goatee. A hypnotist (Derek Jacobi) tries to help this unknown woman by putting her in contact with her memories so she can figure out who she is. Only instead of accessing memories of her forgotten past, she remembers a husband and wife named Roman and Margaret Strauss (also Kenneth Branagh and Emma Thompson) whose 1940s love story ended in bloody tragedy. 

The woman becomes convinced she’s remembering things that happened, that she used to be Margaret Strauss back in the 1940s. They find pictures of the Strausses, and sure enough, she looks like Margaret, and Mike looks like Roman. From newspaper clippings, they learn that a jury convicted and executed Roman for killing his wife with a pair of scissors. Mike is initially skeptical, but an ex-psychiatrist (Robin Williams) convinces him to take the idea seriously. So he tries to track down a newspaper reporter (Andy Garcia) who did a lot of articles on the mystery fifty years earlier, hoping to find a reason why the woman he’s falling in love with thinks he murdered her in a past life and might do it again. 

When I say I have never seen another film like Dead Again, I am not being hyperbolic. And not just because married-at-the-time co-stars Branagh and Thompson play multiple roles. Or because they’re British actors doing such good non-British accents I forget they’re not Americans (or random Europeans). I’ve just never seen a noir film that used such a literal theme of the-past-will-haunt you. And I’ve never seen one focused on that theme that ended quite this way either. 

I don’t want to ruin the ending, so I’ll just say it wraps up in a way that's much more optimistic than I expected. Even if Mike Church and the amnesiac woman he loves can’t outrun the past, they can put it to rest once and for all.


(This post originally appeared in Femnista magazine on November 25, 2017.)

Tuesday, October 18, 2022

My Ten Favorite Non-Scary Movies for Fall

I don't like scary movies.  At all.  But I do like a good, broody, atmospheric, gothic-type movie, especially in October.  Something with dark vibes and dark shadows and dark characters, and maybe a little supernatural or psychological eeriness tossed in, but not actually a scary movie, you know?  Perfect for curling up on the couch with a mug of hot cider and a cozy blanket while the wind howls outside and the rain taps gently against the window...


Well, if you like those sorts of movies too, here's a list of ten I love and recommend!  Just in case you're craving some dark, moody, shadowy goodness yourself right now.  Links go to my own reviews so you can learn more about those titles if you'd like.


1. The Hound of the Baskervilles (1988)  Sherlock Holmes (Jeremy Brett) and Dr. Watson (Edward Hardwicke) help Sir Henry Baskerville (Kristoffer Tabori) uncover the dark truth behind his forbear's death out on the wild and gloomy moors.  I crave this every October, really.  Some years, I make myself watch a different version, just to make this more fresh the next year, but this is my favorite fall watch.  I often reread the book in October too.


2. Jane Eyre (1983)  Lonely governess Jane Eyre (Zelah Clarke) finds understanding, companionship, and love with Mr. Rochester (Timothy Dalton) in this pitch-perfect BBC miniseries that absolutely kickstarted my devotion to the book it's based on.  (If you don't have time for all four hours, the 2011 version is my other favorite, and it's half as long.  If you want to go really classic, the 1943 version is shrouded in shadows and mystery.)


3. Hamlet (2011) Hamlet (Bruce Ramsay) suspects his uncle Claudius (Peter Winfield) killed Hamlet's father before marrying his mother (Gillian Barber), and he spends the night after their wedding trying to find out.  They trim all of Hamlet down to 1 hour and 27 minutes, give it a neo-noir feel, and it is spectacular.  However, please note that it is rated R for some easy-to-skip adult scenes.  (If you can't get your hands on this version, or don't want to deal with the adult content, the 1948 Olivier and the 2009 Tennant versions both have excellent shadowy vibes and are tamer.)


4. Laura (1944) Detective Mark MacPherson (Dana Andrews) tries to solve the murder of a beautiful woman named Laura (Gene Tierney).  Her family and friends all insist she was lovable, intelligent, talented, and altogether wonderful... so why did someone want to kill her?  This is my favorite noir film, and it has one of the best twists in any movie I've ever seen.  Go into it not knowing much more than this and prepare to fall in love with Laura yourself.


5. The Phantom of the Opera (2004)  A beautiful young singer (Emmy Rossum) reunites with her childhood sweetheart (Patrick Wilson), but her mysterious singing mentor (Gerard Butler) turns out to be an obsessive, possessive killer who wants her for himself.  The whole production is over-the-top lavish, dripping with candlelight and shadows and emotions.  


6. Dead Again (1991)  An amnesiac woman (Emma Thompson) keeps having nightmares about scissors.  A kind P.I. (Kenneth Branagh) tries to help her recover her memory.  And then they discover they may be the reincarnations of two doomed lovers who lived back during the Roaring Twenties, and solving that long-ago murder may be the only way to secure their own peace and happiness.  This one is also rated R because Robin Williams cusses a LOT in his few scenes, and there's some violence.  It would clean up easily with a filtering service, though.


7. Rebecca (1940)  A young bride (Joan Fontaine) is haunted by the suspicion that her new husband (Laurence Olivier) still loves his dead first wife, Rebecca.  Such a fascinating look at doubt, obsession, misconceptions, and consequences.  It's one of Hitchcock's best.


8. Shadow of a Doubt (1943)  A teen girl (Theresa Wright) adores her visiting uncle (Joseph Cotten) until she begins to wonder if he's connected to a recent string of murders.  Another masterpiece about doubt and fear from Alfred Hitchcock.


9. Cry Wolf (1947)  A widow (Barbara Stanwyck) thinks her late husband's uncle (Errol Flynn) is hiding a terrible secret.  It turns out he is, but it's not the secret she's expecting.  There's murder and madness and a gloomy old manor house dripping with shadows -- and also combative romance, just to keep things peppy.
 

10. Meet Joe Black (1998)  Death (Brad Pitt) takes on a human body to experience life, manipulating an aging man (Anthony Hopkins) into helping him.  Death romances the man's daughter (Claire Forlani), tastes peanut butter for the first time, and learns what it means to be both human and kind.  This one is PG-13 mostly for a short and easy-to-skip love scene.


Have you seen any of these?  What are some of your favorite non-scary movies to watch in the fall?

Sunday, February 13, 2022

"Death on the Nile" (2022) -- Initial Thoughts

I FINALLY GOT TO SEE THIS MOVIE!  I have waited for more than two years to see this movie.  And I have finally seen it.

Unfortunately, that long wait may have built my expectations up higher than this movie could actually bear.  I did like it.  But I didn't love it.  And maybe that's because... it would be really hard for any movie to live up to two years' worth of expectations and anticipation?  Possibly.

Except I often have movies that I really, really want to see and don't get a chance to see for years and years.  So I'm not convinced that over-anticipation is the reason I didn't love it.

Part of what I didn't love is how much they pushed the PG-13 boundaries in regards to sensuality.  There's a lot of suggestive bumping and grinding and clutching, and even a moment when a woman starts to unbuckle and reach inside her husband's pants.  It gets way too hot and heavy for me to let my 14-year-old watch this, for sure.  I, as a married adult, was uncomfortable.  And that was just not necessary.  Sigh.

The mystery itself is thoroughly mysterious.  People keep dying under Hercule Poirot's very mustache.  He is flummoxed.  In fact, he might be too flummoxed.  He really didn't do any detecting of note until very close to the end of the film.  It was almost like he was along for the ride on the murder boat, then finally got around to trying to solve things after multiple bodies had stacked up.  And it's not like he really stopped any more murders from happening, he just figured out who did the killing.  I don't think anyone else was going to get killed, by the time he solved it.  

I haven't read the novel yet, though it's been sitting on my shelf for two years, waiting for me to see this so I could read the book after.  I suspect I may like the book better.  We'll see.

(MAJOR SPOILERS in this paragraph!)  And, yes, part of what made me not love this movie was that Armie Hammer's character turns out to be a villain, and I am always vexed when a favorite of mine plays a bad guy.  Especially when I don't know going in that they'll be the bad guy.  So, there's that.  Plus, there's really no justice served on the guilty parties, as they commit murder-suicide to get out of going to jail.  Hmm.

(END OF SPOILERS)

So... I'm not saying "this movie isn't worth seeing," but it's not one I'll be buying so I can watch it over and over.  Which I was kind of hoping it would be, so that's a disappointment.  However, I will say that Armie Hammer was devastatingly handsome, Gal Gadot and Letitia Wright were very beautiful, and the whole movie was aesthetically elegant.  I do love how Branagh directs, with every shot very purposeful and never shaky or distractingly showy.  And the music by Patrick Doyle was lovely.  I may pick up the soundtrack at some point, since I do love Doyle's scores.

Saturday, May 02, 2020

A Shakespeare's Birthday Tag!

Movies Meet Their Match tagged me with this last week.  Shakespeare's birthday is past now, but you know what?  I don't care.  I'm going to do this anyway!


(Mine from my Instagramming adventures)

The Rules: 

1. Answer truthfully, and then "Thou canst not then be false to any man." (I'll try!)

2. Tag at least three people and let them know that they've been tagged. "For he today who does this tag with me shall be my brother..."  (We'll see...)

3.Link back to the person who tagged you (done!) and post a link to your post in the comments of this original post at The Tearoom blog, where the tag started.  (Will do!)

The Questions: 

1. What was the first exposure you ever had to Shakespeare?

Watching West Side Story with my mom -- does that count?

If not, then this: when I was about 16, our homeschool group went to see a presentation by some traveling theater troupe that was all about how Shakespeare affects and informs storytelling today, basically.  I discovered that afternoon that a LOT of Classic Star Trek episodes got their titles from Shakespeare, and I decided to read all his plays and figure out all the episode titles that referenced his works.  This was before Google, I couldn't just look it up -- this was the dark ages of the mid-'90s.  So I got this giant volume of his works from the library and just began at the beginning.  Which I think was Two Gentlemen from Verona.  I only got partway through that tome, maybe read 6 or 7 plays, before I got to Hamlet and sort of got stuck.  Read it twice, bought my own chunkster volume of his works when I was 17, memorized a soliloquy or two... and didn't read any others of his plays until I got to college a year or so later.  Just sort of dwelt on that one.



2. How many of Shakespeare's plays have you seen?

A lot.  No, seriously.  A lot.

(I'm including some retellings, and I've linked titles to my reviews where applicable.)

Watched live on stage:

Antony and Cleopatra
Otello (opera version of Othello)
The Tempest
Twelfth Night
A Midsummer Night's Dream
Much Ado About Nothing 
Hamlet (2009 -- Law)
Hamlet (2018 -- Innerst)


Watched on film:

Antony and Cleopatra (1972)
The Banquet (2006 retelling of Hamlet)
Hamlet (1948 -- Olivier)
Hamlet (1964 -- Burton)
Hamlet (1969 -- Williamson)
Hamlet (1980 -- Jacobi)
Hamlet (1990 -- Gibson)
Hamlet (1990 -- Kline)
Hamlet (1996 -- Branagh)
Hamlet (2000 -- Hawke)
Hamlet (2000 -- Scott)
Hamlet (2002 -- Lester)
Hamlet (2004 opera based on Alexandre Dumas' adaptation of the play)
Hamlet (2009 -- Tennant)
Hamlet (2011 -- Ramsey)
Hamlet (2015 -- Cumberbatch)
Henry V (1989)
Julius Caesar (1953)
Kiss Me, Kate (1953 retelling of The Taming of the Shrew)
Love's Labours Lost (2000)
Macbeth (2015)
A Midsummer Night's Dream (2020 live-stream production)
Much Ado About Nothing (1993)
Ophelia (2018 retelling of Hamlet)
Richard III (1995)
Romeo and Juliet (1968)
Romeo + Juliet (1996)
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead (1990 sort-of retelling of Hamlet)
10 Things I Hate About You (1999 retelling of The Taming of the Shrew)
A Thousand Acres (1997 retelling of King Lear)
Titus (1999 movie version of Titus Andronicus)
West Side Story (1961 retelling of Romeo and Juliet)
The Wild and the Dirty (1968 retelling of Hamlet)



3. What is your favorite Shakespeare play?

In case you couldn't guess from the name of this blog and the lists above, it's Hamlet, Prince of Denmark.


4. What is your favorite non-Shakespearean play? {musicals are permissible}

Hmm.  Probably The Odd Couple by Neil Simon.  He's my other favorite playwright.


5. What is an adaptation of one of Shakespeare's plays that you like? Why?

You think I can choose ONE?  ONE???  Hahaha.  Inconceivable.

How about my top five filmed versions:

Hamlet (2011 -- Bruce Ramsay)
Hamlet (2000 -- Ethan Hawke)
Hamlet (2015 -- Benedict Cumberbatch)
Much Ado About Nothing (1993)
Ten Things I Hate About You (1999)


6. Who is your favorite Shakespearean character?

Take a wild guess ;-)


7. What is your favorite Shakespeare quote?

"The readiness is all." -- Hamlet

(Also mine from my Instagramming adventures)

8. If you were in a Shakespearean production, which play would you want to be in, and which character?

Beatrice in Much Ado About Nothing would be really fun.

9. Have you read any of Shakespeare's sonnets and, if so, which is your favorite?

I have read quite a few, but I don't have a favorite.

10. Have you ever written/tried to write a play?

I've written several short plays and some radio dramas, none shareable ;-)  That was long ago.  I stick to novels and short stories these days.

11. Cast one of the big five {Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet, Macbeth, Richard III, or Much Ado About Nothing} with modern actors from either the stage or the screen. {you only have to do main characters.}

I will, shock of all shocks, share an ideal modern Hamlet casting:

Hamlet -- Michael Fassbender
Horatio -- Armie Hammer
Laertes -- Chris Evans
Ophelia -- Rosamund Pike
Claudius -- Brian Cox
Gertrude -- Helen Mirren
Polonius -- Ian McKellen

(They're all almost a bit old for these roles now, so probably we should have filmed this 10 years ago.)


(Oh man, now I just WANT THIS to be a real movie.)

If you're curious, I did an ideal 1940s casting for a film noir version of Hamlet a few years ago.  I've wanted to see Alan Ladd as Hamlet since a decade before I was obsessed with him, isn't that funny?  Ever since I saw him in This Gun for Hire the first time somewhere around 2005.  I still want it.  Sigh.  Where's my time machine?

Anyway, this was such a fun tag!  Thank you for nominating me, MovieCritic!

I'm not actually going to tag anyone because... I don't feel like it.  And Shakespeare's birthday is past for the year anyway.  But if you want to snurch this and do it yourself, go for it!

Friday, August 09, 2019

My Ten Favorite Noir Films -- 2019 Update

Like my new list of favorite western films, the list of my favorite noir films has changed a lot since I first posted one six years ago, all because of one certain actor.

I mean, how was I NOT going to love Alan Ladd when the majority of his films are in my two favorite genres?  It was inevitable.

Anyway.  Here is my current list of ten favorite noir films!  Titles linked to my reviews where applicable.


1. Laura (1944) While solving the murder of beautiful Laura Hunt (Gene Tierney), Detective Mark McPherson (Dana Andrews) falls in love with her memory. The most haunting murder mystery of all time.

2. This Gun for Hire (1942) A remorseless killer-for-hire (Alan Ladd) teams up with a singing magician (Veronica Lake) to help the government stop bad guys from selling American military secrets to the enemy. This is the movie that turned Ladd into a star, and it's not hard to see why -- he's riveting.

3. Dead Again (1991) A kindhearted PI (Kenneth Branagh) tries to help an amnesiac (Emma Thompson) remember who she is, only to learn that they may have been intimately linked to each other in a past life.  This is a twisty thriller involving reincarnation and it never fails to thrill me, even though I obviously don't believe reincarnation is a real thing.

4. The Great Gatsby (1949) F. Scott Fitzgerald's classic story gets a film noir twist. A successful gangster (Alan Ladd) buys a new house across the water from an old flame (Betty Field) whose cousin (Macdonald Carey) just happens to be Gatsby's next-door neighbor. I've yet to see another portrayal of Gatsby as haunting and heartfelt as Ladd's.

5. To Have and Have Not (1944) Fisherman Harry Morgan (Humphrey Bogart) gets tangled up with a wandering woman (Lauren Bacall) and a bunch of anti-Nazi French patriots during WWII. Loosely based on characters from the Ernest Hemingway novel by the same title.

6. The Blue Dahlia (1946) A weary veteran (Alan Ladd) returns home and finds his wife (Doris Dowling) is cheating on him with a nightclub owner (Howard da Silva). When she turns up dead, he's the prime suspect. The nightclub owner's wife (Veronica Lake) tries to help him solve the murder. It's the only original screenplay written by my favorite author, Raymond Chandler, and its dialog sizzles delightfully.

7. The Big Sleep (1946) PI Philip Marlowe (Humphrey Bogart) takes a case for a wealthy family with a lot of secrets. Pairs Bogart again with the love of his real life, Lauren Bacall, and is based on the novel by my favorite author, Raymond Chandler.

8. LA Confidential (1997) Three Hollywood cops (Russell Crowe, Kevin Spacey, and Guy Pearce) wrestle with corruption, vice, murder, and conspiracy. One of the most intricately plotted movies ever, with all kinds of disparate strands woven together to form a dazzling whole.

9. Road to Perdition (2002) A hitman (Tom Hanks) takes his son (Tyler Hoechlin) on the run, seeking vengeance for the brutal murder of his wife (Jennifer Jason Leigh) and other son. Brilliant acting from all involved, including Paul Newman, Jude Law, and Daniel Craig.

10. Brick (2005) High school loner Brendan (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) investigates the murder of the girl he may have loved, discovering a teenage underworld in the process. One of the most creative movies I've ever seen.

NOTE:  Dead AgainLA ConfidentialRoad to Perdition, and Brick are all rated R.  With good reason.  Proceed with caution.

Tuesday, December 29, 2015

"Hamlet" (1996) Soundtrack Guest Review Up AND a Giveaway Reminder


I've got a review of Patrick Doyle's soundtrack for Hamlet (1996) up here at J and J Productions today.  And, as I mention in that post, I am giving away a copy of said soundtrack here on my book blog, as well as DVDs of two different productions of Hamlet and some Hamlet stickers.  So if you haven't done so already, do check out both my soundtrack review and my Hamlet giveaway!  The giveaway is world-wide and open through next Monday, January 4th.

Sunday, March 29, 2015

"Cinderella" (2015)

I have seen this twice now, and can definitely say that this is a movie I enjoy wholeheartedly.  I'm not quite ready to say it's a favorite, but it may become one in time.

I went to see this on opening weekend, and then last weekend, I took both my girls to see it.  Sarah is 5, Tootie is 3, and they love princesses.  The animated Cinderella (1950) is the first princess movie they ever saw, and remains one of their favorites, so they were beyond excited to see a new version of a story they knew with "real people in it!"  Not only that, but they had only ever been to the movie theater once before (two years ago, to see Planes), so getting to go to that place Mommy goes to a lot was also a special treat.  (Sam declined to go, partly because he's "not that much into princesses," and partly because he really dislikes the animated Cinderella because of how mean the stepmother and stepsisters are.)

I think what I like best about this movie is that it's a straight-forward retelling of this well-known story.  There's no twist.  It's not about the villain, it's not filled with sly winks to how cute such an old-fashioned story is, it's not sexed up.  It's not modernized in any way, really.  And while I really like Mirror Mirror's cheekiness, and I hear Maleficent is cool, it's very refreshing to me to see a fairy tale treated as if it's worth telling for its own sake, not for what someone can make out of it.

And who is more trustworthy for giving us a good story well told than Kenneth Branagh?  From Shakespeare to superheroes, he's showed us time and again that he will take a story seriously, will tell it for its own sake, while still getting us to see and understand that story and its characters better than we had before.


I was going to add a bunch of pictures to this, but I've done so many picture-heavy posts over the last week that I think I'm going to leave this the way it is.  If you want to see some amazing production stills, I highly advise you go here and just keep clicking on the pictures to see more and more and more.  This is a sumptuous production, every frame filled with exquisite detail, and I have to admit I'm kind of tempted to go see it on the big screen one more time to drink it all in.

Oh, and I bought the soundtrack because I love Patrick Doyle.  It's awesome!

Is this a family-friendly movie?  Yes.  There's a bit more cleavage on display than I would be comfortable showing myself, and there's one mildly scary moment where a carriage almost goes off a cliff, but there's zero bad language or truly frightening things.  I felt perfectly comfortable letting my 3- and 5-year-olds see it, and I'm pretty sure we'll be buying the DVD and watching it over and over and over too.

Monday, February 24, 2014

"Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets" (2002)

Well, it only took five months, but we finally got the next Harry Potter movie out of the library.  I'd also only seen this one on DVD one time, ten whole years ago, and Cowboy hadn't seen it at all, so this was quite fun for both of us.

Except for the spiders.  As Ron said, "Why spiders?  Why couldn't it be follow the butterflies?"  What is it with giant spiders?  Enough with them already.  Why doesn't anyone do giant butterflies?  I think they'd be quite menacing too, with their giant wings causing huge winds and such.  Please, someone write a fantasy book involving giant butterflies!  I would totally read it.  They could be like dragons, only not meat-eating.

So, once again, the best part of this movie for me was the casting.  Specifically, Kenneth Branagh as Gilderoy Lockhart.  The returning cast were lovely again, but the bright spot in this movie for me is Branagh.  He made me grin every single time he was on screen, and he made me laugh aloud with glee more than once.


One of the things I enjoy most about Branagh is how he always looks like he's so tickled to be acting in a movie, like he can hardly believe his good luck to be taking part in such an adventure.  That is never more evident than in this movie, where he smirks and flourishes with relish.  My favorite scene in the whole movie is his wizarding duel with Severus Snape, which goes so magnificently badly for Lockhart.

Another great casting addition was Jason Isaacs as Lucius Malfoy.  He's so sneeringly superior, and also clearly enjoying the chance to be menacing and snide.


As for the rest of the movie, I'm happy to say the special effects are much improved over Sorcerer's Stone (2001), particularly in the Quidditch game.  The green screen was no longer so painfully obvious there.  I did feel like the flying car sequences went on too long, and the need to re-introduce people to the wizarding world made the beginning a bit draggy.

So anyway, fun movie, but again nothing stellar.  It's better than the first movie, just like the second book is better than the first.

Sunday, June 24, 2012

Thor, Prince of... Denmark?

So, being on this huge Avengers kick right now, and not being able to go see it whenever I want to, I'm starting to watch the movies that led up to it.  I started with Thor (2011), which is totally out of order, but hey, it's me!  Obviously going to start with the stand-alone about my fave Avenger.

I spent the first section of it going, "Um, really?  I see."  It's much different than I was expecting, much more stylized and fantasy-based.  Which is not exactly bad, just not what I was expecting.  Once Thor hit Earth, I grooved on it much more, as I like Natalie Portman and I love fish-out-of-water stories.  Thor adjusts to modern life fairly quickly, and because he's a god, I'm okay with that.  (Not like in Kate & Leopold, where Leopold's adjusting so quickly annoys me and is the main reason I don't love a movie that stars three of my favorite actors.)  One of my favorite moments is when Thor's eating (and eating and eating, even though it's not shawarma) and tosses a coffee mug to the ground in appreciation of how tasty it is -- I love the culture clash right there, it made me laugh and laugh.

But anyway, after watching Thor, I had a blog post about it all planned out.  And then before I could write it, I had a revelation.  While sitting in the car in the grocery store parking lot, as a matter of fact.  And the revelation was that, although I was not fond of some of the FX, and there were parts that felt rushed, the movie as a whole appealed to me for one simple reason:  it's basically a retelling of Hamlet.

Okay, stop sniggering and rolling your eyes.  I know, I know, I'm a nut on the subject.  But let me list the similarities:

  • Thor's father winds up in a coma at the hand of Thor's adopted brother, Loki; Hamlet's father winds up dead at the hands of Hamlet's uncle, Claudius.  Loki's words sent Odin into the coma, while Claudius poured poison into King Hamlet's ear, but since evil words are a kind of poison, I say the comparison works.
  • Thor gets banished to Earth;  Hamlet gets banished to England.
  • Loki usurps the throne while Odin is incapacitated;  Claudius usurps the throne once King Hamlet is dead.
  • Thor returns from Earth to stop Loki from starting a war and claim his rightful place as King of Asgard;  Hamlet returns from England to avenge his father's murder and take his rightful place as King of Denmark.
  • Loki uses his silver tongue to get him out of trouble several times; Claudius uses his powers of persuasion to keep Laertes from killing him, to woo Gertrude, and to convince all the courtiers that him taking his brother's wife and throne is perfectly acceptable.
  • Thor's climax is a big duel between Thor and Loki;  Hamlet's climax is a big duel between Hamlet and Laertes.

Thor/Hamlet, Odin/King Hamlet, and Loki/Claudius

It's not perfect or complete, I grant you.  But there are a lot of plot similarities (and thematic ones too, which I may go into another time), and I'm wondering if they're what drew Kenneth Branagh to the project in the first place.  I have to say, thinking of Thor as a kind of retelling of Hamlet makes me like it a lot better, and now I really want to watch it again, to see if I can find other similarities.

EDIT:  I read an article that quoted Branagh as saying he thought of Thor as very similar to Henry V.  That works too.  Who am I to argue with Branagh?

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Right, so I just finished rewatching Kenneth Branagh's version of Hamlet to see if I like it better now that I know he meant to make Hamlet a more cheerful fellow than is generally portrayed.

And I do. I really wasn't annoyed by him at all this time around, and got all sympatico with the character the way I usually do in other versions. I had always been rather annoyed with Branagh for getting Hamlet so monumentally weird and chipper, but now I kind of dig it. Although why his hair and mustache are so very mismatched still puzzles me, but oh well.

That's not to say I now readily embrace this version and want to run out and buy it. A few things still bug me, like the overblown spookiness of the Ghost scene (Joss Whedon could teach Branagh a thing or two about creeping people out without seeming silly), some of the excessively showy cinematography (that scene where he makes his "my thoughts be bloody or be nothing worth" speech is just funkily shot), and the doofy chandelier thing at the end (a thrown sword through the chest isn't enough to finish Claudius off? We have to whack him with a giant chandelier too? Why?). Oh, and the big militaristic invasion by Fortinbras' army at the end annoys me, because I don't want to hate Fortinbras for being a liar, I just want to be annoyed by him for being opportunistic. But he's played by the bad guy from A Knight's Tale here, so I guess I can hate him happily.

But there are several things that used to bug me that didn't this time around. Chief among those is Osric. I guess I'm just used to Osric's weirdness now, because I remember absolutely hating Robin Williams' performance here, and now it didn't bother me at all. In fact, considering it's Williams, I think it's pretty restrained.

This version does have my absolute favorite Horatio: Nicholas Farrell. He makes me weep at the end, more than Hamlet himself. He is the sweetest Horatio ever, and if I ever buy this version (yeah, yeah, I probably will get it eventually), it will be because of him. He does justice to the role of Horatio the way Liev Schreiber does to the role of Laertes in the Ethan Hawke version. It's exactly the way I always want Horatio to be played, sympathetic and brave and intelligent and loyal and trustworthy and perfect. I've never seen the performance matched, not in the filmed versions I've seen, anyway.

One of these days, when I'm not madly packing for the big move, I shall post a really long discussion of all the versions I have seen and what I liked and disliked about them, along with a list of my favorite portrayal of the main characters. Won't that be fun? :-D

Wednesday, November 07, 2007

Blast it all, I'm going to have to watch Kenneth Branagh's version of Hamlet again.

Wait a minute, you say, Hamlette adores watching Hamlet! She owns multiple versions of it, she has huge chunks memorized... she named herself after it, for cryin' out loud!

Yeah, but I don't like Branagh's version very well and don't own it. The only version I've seen that I liked less was Laurence Olivier's, as I've come to disagree quite strongly with his belief that the play is about a guy who can't make up his mind. The main reason I don't like Branagh's is because he's just so doggone cheery-looking through most of it. Branagh works fine for me as Benedick in Much Ado About Nothing and as the title character in Henry V, because neither of them are terribly serious characters. But I do not dig him as Hamlet.

Or I haven't so far. But I got the soundtrack for his version from the library to listen to do while working on my Nanovel, since part of it involves a college production of Hamlet. And in the liner notes, Branagh writes:
"Our Hamlet is not presented as a man predisposed to melancholy. His usual character, described so often in the play, is vibrant, curious, positive... For me, the play is partly a search (through Hamlet's extraordinary mind) for what makes life worth living. When afforded a glimpse of those things that occasionally inspire Hamlet -- love, friendship, the theatre -- I wanted the music to soar with Hamlet's temporary optimism and hope."
That is rather a different view of the character than I've ever taken, but it's one I'm very drawn to, because, well, I identify greatly with Hamlet in many ways, except I'm ordinarily a very happy, optimistic, hopeful person. But I've never thought that, before his father's death and his mother's o'erhasty remarriage, he might not have been a Broody Boy at all. And that's a really cool thing to think about, and makes me even sadder for what he goes through in the play.

So now I need to rewatch this version, to see if it works any better for me with all this in mind. Hooray for free interlibrary loans! I'll probably get to see it next week.