Sunday, August 27, 2023

"Indiscreet" (1958)


I first saw Indiscreet (1958) in my late teens.  Some local station must have shown it, and we recorded it because my family liked Cary Grant.  I remember thinking it was such a funny, smart movie, but that my mom didn't really like it.  I think I get why she wouldn't like it the first time, but I'm not sure why she was cool with That Touch of Mink (1962), which has similar moral quandries, but didn't like this one.  I can only recall that this was a movie I tended to watch when my parents were out of the house because my mom never wanted to rewatch it.


Anna (Ingrid Bergman) is a famous and popular actress on the London stage.  She's also suddenly single again, having broken up with her latest boyfriend and come home to her London apartment to be alone and get over him.  Not expecting company, she nibbles a snack and puts cold cream all over her face.  Her sister Margaret (Phyllis Calvert) and brother-in-law Alfred (Cecil Parker) stop by to change clothes before going to an important dinner -- they don't live in London and often use Anna's flat to change, whether she is there or not.


Unexpectedly, at least to Anna, a dapper banker named Philip (Cary Grant) stops by too.  He's to be the speaker at the dinner that Alfred and Margaret are attending, and they are escorting him there, or something.

Although Anna has cold cream all over her face when he first sees her, thus rendering her hideous by Hollywood standards, Philip is obviously enchanted by her.


At the end of the evening, Anna invites Philip back to her apartment for a nighcap.  

Random side note: I really love Anna's apartment, and have long dreamed of doing a similar thing with colored mattes around cool sketches reaching up to the ceiling.  I haven't ever lived anywhere that this would work, but I still think it is super nifty.


Anna and Philip are obviously attracted to each other, and they know it.  But Philip drops a bomb in the middle of their flirtatious shared drink: he is married, and he can't possibly get a divorce.

Another side note:  I have a particular fondness for the way that Cary Grant says the word "divorce."  He says "dee-vorce," and it's cute and different and funny, and I like it.


Philip makes a graceful exit, having made it clear that if he embarked on a relationship with Anna, it could never end in marriage, it could only be temporary.  Anna decides she doesn't care and invites him to go to the ballet with her the next evening.  Instead of going to the ballet, they wander around London with Anna's chauffeur Carl (David Kossoff) following them discreetly in Anna's car.


By the end of the evening, Anna and Philip have come to an unspoken agreement.  They will see each other romantically, they will commit adultery together, they will be... indiscreet, basically.  And, while I am wholeheartedly opposed to adultery, I can't help but love the way the filmmakers handle this.  Because we don't have any dialog about it.  We don't have any scenes of the two characters sharing a bed.  We don't even have very many kissing scenes.  It is 100% closed-door, in modern parlance, including a moment when the pair go into Anna's apartment and literally close the door on the camera, and that is all we have to know.  We, the audience, know what they're intending to do together, but we never have to see it, or start to imagine it.  We just merrily go forward, seeing what happens to two people who fall in love when they know they morally should not.


We get a couple of cute scenes of Philip and Anna talking on the phone from their respective abodes, and you might say this is copying Pillow Talk (1959), except that Indiscreet was released a year before that Doris Day romp.


Philip and Anna give each other gifts, go to parties together, spend cozy evenings together, go shopping together -- but always, there's that lingering sense that they could be having an even better time if they didn't have the simple fact hanging over their heads that Philip has a wife somewhere.


This shot is really only here to add to my growing collection of unusual ways to stage kisses. 


Well.  We get two-thirds of the way through the movie, all glamor and romance and lovely accents... and then another bomb drops.  This is a very big bomb, the kind that causes a paradigm shift.  I am going to SPOIL it here, quite thoroughly, so if you don't want spoilage, please STOP reading here and drop down to under the picture that says "THE END."

Can't say I didn't warn you.

The second bomb is this: Philip is not married.  He has never been married.  He just lies and tells people that he's married so that his paramours never try to get him to marry them.  He's a serial monogamist who pretends to be a serial bigamist.

This paradigm shift makes Anna -- and the audience -- reevaluate everything Philip has said and done.  And the hilarious thing is, it makes Anna feel more immoral than when she thought she was committing adultery with him.  As long as she believed Philip was being honest with her, she didn't mind being an adulteress.  But now that she's discovered she's just a common fornicator who's been lied to, she is furious.  Livid, even.  How dare he deceive her?

And this is what makes me love this movie.  It points out the absolute absurdity of assuming that one form of sexual relationship outside of marriage is any worse than any other.  And it points out all the problems that result from going to bed with someone you're not married to, whether or not either of you are married to someone else.  

Also, it's handled in a super funny way, with lots of sharp, witty dialog.

Deceit piles up on top of deceit until both Anna and Philip are going in circles trying to figure out what's true.  And, of course, everything smooths out in the end, and they wind up deciding to get married to each other.  One hopes they have also learned the vital importance of being honest with each other too.


END of SPOILERS!  It's safe to read again.

Is this movie family friendly?  Weirdly, yes.  Like I said, aside from some kissing, there's no real sexual content here.  No cussing, no violence.  Kids probably won't find it funny, and won't fully understand what's going on, but it's not a dirty movie in any way.  Does have one shouted cuss word, but said with Bergman's accent, so it's not necessarily obviously a cuss word.


This review is my contribution to the 6th Wonderful Ingrid Bergman Blogathon hosted by the Wonderful World of Cinema in honor of Bergman's birthday this week.

29 comments:

  1. While this is not my favourite Ingrid Bergman film, there are so many things I love about it! Last time I watched it was at the TCM Film Festival and it was wonderful to see it on big screen. I love reading your thoughts on the film, definitely and article that makes me want to see it again! :) Thanks so much for taking part in the blogathon!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Virginie, how amazing this must look on the big screen! All those lavish details in the backgrounds. Lucky you!

      Delete
  2. Did Cary Grant always play characters who lied or were deceitful in some important way? That seems to be a common thread in the Cary Grant films I know of, but I don't know a ton about his filmography, so maybe I'm seeing a pattern that isn't there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Katie, no, I don't think so. I think that there are certain films (Indiscreet, Charade) where the filmmakers utilize the fact that he is so likeable and well-loved, they know the audience will trust his character through some revealed lying, whether it's fairly scurrilous like in this, or part of his job as a spy like in Charade. Both of those are toward the end of his career, when he was well-established and very popular.

      Now, in some of his Hitchcock movies, especially Suspicion and To Catch a Thief, the audience is encouraged to be suspicious of him because he might be up to something bad/illegal.

      But in the vast majority of his movies that I have seen (Topper, Father Goose, His Girl Friday, The Grass is Greener, The Philadelphia Story, North by Northwest, Arsenic and Old Lace, Monkey Business, An Affair to Remember, That Touch of Mink, The Bishop's Wife), lying is NOT part of his character's persona or arc. In fact, in several of those, he is the one either being lied to or trying to discover the truth.

      Delete
    2. Katie, I would add that in both North by Northwest and To Catch a Thief his character's biggest problem is that he is constantly and consistently telling the truth, but people refuse to believe him.

      Delete
    3. Interesting! Yeah, I always associate Grant with lying and being unlikable, probably because Charade was one of the first Cary Grant movies I watched and I couldn't stand him in it. That and To Catch a Thief.

      Delete
    4. Katie, I'm trying to think what my first Cary Grant movie was. Probably Father Goose -- he's a curmudgeon in that, but not a liar ;-)

      Delete
    5. Noooooooooooo, not the curmudgeon!

      Delete
    6. I have long had an unfathomable fondness for curmudgeons and generally grumpy old men, on screen, in books, and in real life. I have been known to collect them in a sort of posse.

      Delete
  3. I love this movie for all the reasons you outlined. It's witty and stylish, and I like how it's "naughty" without necessarily being dirty. Also Bergman is very funny in it-- I love when she discovers Grant's secret and loses her cool ("DAMNNNNN!").

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nitrate Glow, yes, Bergman is equally as funny as Grant in this, and that is high praise indeed!

      Delete
  4. I love this film too. Stylish and romantic with some unexpected twists and turns thrown in there as well. I wish Ingrid and Cary had made so many more films together over the years.

    Great piece, Rachel. Hope all good with you.

    Maddy from Classic Film And TV Corner.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maddy, yes! Stylish, romantic, twisty -- good stuff! And Bergman and Grant really did have great chemistry :-)

      Things are a little hectic here, but good. How're you?

      Delete
    2. I enjoyed this take on Indiscreet. I enjoyed it too, especially the humor and chemistry, and Grant's fabulous dance scene. You're so right about her beautiful wall, and I'm so amused you have a "growing collection of unusual ways to stage kisses. "

      Delete
    3. Thanks, CaryGrantWontEatYou! That dance scene is such fun! And so funny, since she's pretending to enjoy it and then glares daggers whenever he isn't looking.

      I will do a post sometime about unusual ways to stage a kiss, as I do have a few and will likely gather more :-) I also have a collection of screenshots of people writing things down, and of people on the phone. And of "the end" at the end of old movies -- those are often so fun.

      Delete
  5. Its been YEARS since I've seen this movie and NEED to re-watch it!!! Thank you so much for reminding me just how brilliant it is!! The humor, the chemistry, the DANCE scene!!! You just can't help it but all in love with this movie!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Flapper Dame, you are welcome for the reminder! I hadn't watched it in probably twenty years -- not since college. So many great moments in it!

      Delete
  6. I loved your review of this movie I like so much! I also adore her apartment, and thanks to your review I now want to rewatch this great pairing between Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Le! Isn't her apartment wonderful? I love the little rounded foyer area by the door, all the artwork, the high ceilings -- so elegant and sophisticated, but also practical.

      You can really tell that Grant and Bergman know each other well, I think. They have a really comfortable chemistry that makes you believe their characters fell in love instantly.

      Delete
  7. I didn’t care for this the first time I saw it but at the time I didn’t really care for Bergman. I’ve been meaning to rewatch it for some time now that I’m a Bergman fan. I love the Christmas shot and her apartment kitchen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Phyl, Bergman has never been a huge favorite for me, though I enjoy many of her movies. If you are a fan of hers, you will undoubtedly enjoy her performance here! She gets to show of a pretty wide range of emotions.

      Delete
  8. I tried watching this film several years ago, but couldn't connect with it. But, after reading your fab review, and the comments, I'm going to give it another go with an open mind. I have a feeling I'll like it much better this time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. SIlver Screenings, it's definitely a bit unusual, and kind of daring for the era it was made.

      I often have to watch a movie a second time before I really make my mind up about it. The first watch is all about me wrapping my head around the story, and then the second can be more analytical. Which is why I often try to see a movie a second time before I review it here, as then I will understand it more fully.

      Delete
  9. My mom is a big fan of this film -- now I know why! Thanks for making it clear, Rachel!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Karen, glad you got some understanding of your mom out of reading this :-)

      Delete
  10. Ingrid and Cary would be so good together--they're both elegant but different. I'll have to look for this one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rebecca, Ingrid and Cary were truly good friends in real life, from what I've read, and I think you see that comfortable rapport shine through here. I like them much better together in this than in Notorious.

      Delete
  11. Excellent review of an underrated movie. I just watched it, and I LOVED it! It's sophisticated and smart. And Grant and Bergman are a wonderful screen couple.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Movie Maniac, I'm so glad you loved this one too! I agree, they had marvelous chemistry in this one :-)

      Delete

Agree or disagree? That is the question...

Comments on old posts are always welcome! Posts older than 7 days are on moderation to dissuade spambots, so if your comment doesn't show up right away, don't worry -- it will once I approve it.

(Rudeness and vulgar language will not be tolerated.)