Friday, September 20, 2024

The Slumming Angel: Raymond Chandler


In his essay “The Simple Art of Murder,” Raymond Chandler explores detective fiction in general, but especially the hard-boiled kind he perfected. It includes my favorite bit of writing advice: “When in doubt, have a man come through a door with a gun in his hand.” By which he meant, if you’re not sure what should happen next, make things worse in the most exciting way you can. Which is exactly how his books and stories work—everything goes from bad to worse to the worst imaginable… and then somehow turns out all right in the end. 

Novelist Ross MacDonald said Raymond Chandler “wrote like a slumming angel.” He set his books in the seedy underbelly of 1930s, ’40s, and '50s Los Angeles and its surrounding cities, showing the grime and moral decay that Hollywood glossed over with its movies. The California sun beat down on ugliness and beauty alike, and Chandler strove to capture that combination in his writing. 

I was probably sixteen when I read my first Raymond Chandler mystery, The Big Sleep. It entranced me, and the power of his writing impressed me so much, I fell in love with hard-boiled detective stories and their cousin, film noir, all on the strength of that one novel. 

I love Raymond Chandler’s books more for how he writes them than what he writes about. Yes, I love mysteries, but find his plots often convoluted. They don’t always resolve the way I’d like them to. He himself admitted that he didn’t know who killed one particular character in The Big Sleep. But the way he writes? I am continually in awe. Here are a few quotations from his books to show you what I mean:

Montmar Vista was a few dozen houses of various sizes and shapes hanging by their teeth and eyebrows to a spur of mountain and looking as if a good sneeze would drop them down among the box lunches on the beach. —Farewell, My Lovely 

There was a sad fellow over on a bar stool talking to the bartender, who was polishing a glass and listening with that plastic smile people wear when they are trying not to scream. —The Long Goodbye 

The minutes went by on tiptoe, with their fingers to their lips. — The Lady in the Lake 

It was a nice face, a face you get to like. Pretty, but not so pretty that you would have to wear brass knuckles every time you took it out. — Farewell, My Lovely 

I was as empty of life as a scarecrow’s pockets. — The Big Sleep 

 I went out to the kitchen to make coffee—yards of coffee. Rich, strong, bitter, boiling hot, ruthless, depraved. The life-blood of tired men. — The Long Goodbye 

As you’ve probably gathered, Chandler’s books don’t shy away from subjects that might be shocking, or even taboo. Murder, greed, lust, drug use, blackmail, alcoholism, deviant behavior, and theft all make appearances, some regularly. What’s remarkable about his writing is that he can include subjects like these without making his books dirty. 

My sixteen-year-old self didn’t really get some of the things alluded to in The Big Sleep. I figured out that someone was being blackmailed with a photo of them naked, but I missed the other hints about even seedier subjects. This is because Chandler writes about these things obliquely, not glorifying them by dwelling on them. Instead, he glosses over them so they don’t gain importance from his attention. They exist, but he will not dwell on them. 

I’ve spent a lot of time trying to figure out how he strikes that balance. And I think something else he wrote in “The Simple Art of Murder” goes a long way to explain it. When discussing the sort of detectives he wrote, Chandler said, “Down these mean streets a man must go who is not himself mean, who is neither tarnished nor afraid.” His fictional hero, Philip Marlowe, is such a man. He’s innately honorable, moral, unflinching, and even kind. Though he touches dirt in his cases, he doesn’t become dirty himself. Therefore, neither do his readers. 

I know I’m practically turning this whole article into one long string of quotations, but I want to include one more. Why? Because it so perfectly encapsulates why I love to read detective fiction. When he addressed that question in “The Simple Art of Murder,” he said that it all boils down to the fact that everyone “must escape at times from the deadly rhythm of their private thoughts.” Reading fiction, especially mysteries, is my favorite way to do that. And Raymond Chandler’s books delight me most of all.


(This post originally appeared in Femnista magazine on October 20, 2018.)

6 comments:

  1. This is an excellent post. I'll have to re-read it again and think about its various aspects. I admit I was and am trying so hard to somehow find my way to Chandler and the whole hard-boiled genre. Last week I watched Hawks' movie "The Big Sleep". As an European and Anglophile I lean towards the British "classic whodunnit" or police procedural thing, where in the end everything falls into place (I'm such a stickler for logic...). During and after the movie I began to doubt whether my analytical faculties are still "there" or rapidly beginning to decline, for I was so thoroughly puzzled. I'm glad that you mention in your post that even you as a Chandler fan find his plots often convoluted. After the film, the tv channel showed a Lauren Bacall documentary, and Howard Hawks himself languidly admitted that "logic was not that important". Ok, so no beginning dementia on my part (probably). Reading those quotations in your post, I understand why one can be a Chandler fan thanks to his style of writing. I'll have to try again (I once read "The Little Sister" because it was set in Golden Age Hollywood) and try to pay more attention to the style. Trouble is, I'm so Brit-puzzle conditioned, the plot holes tend to divert my attention from writing style to "heck, why is that guy dead, who is shooting whom and why" etc - - However, your post made me want to give it another try!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Andrea!

      Hardboiled detective stories are definitely a far cry from the British whodunnits! Chandler said of fellow hardboiled mystery writer Dashiell Hammett that he "gave murder back to the kind of people that commit it for reasons, not just to provide a corpse; and with the means at hand, not with hand-wrought dueling pistols, curare, and tropical fish." That was very much what Chandler tried to do, too. His mysteries aren't elegant puzzles for a reader to solve, they're examinations of why people do awful things, and why other people try to right those wrongs.

      The Big Sleep is his most famous book, but my personal favorite is The Lady in the Lake, and I think that one has a more comprehensible plot, if you want to try it instead.

      Delete
  2. I just remembered - you recommended "The Lady in the Lake" to me, and the plot was indeed more comprehensible than the "Big Sleep". Some years ago I read Chandler's "The Simple Art of Murder", and I know that it was not just in that polemical "Atlantic Monthly" essay that he slammed English detective fiction. There's a (I think) quite good article where Curtis Evans points out that Chandler did not hold "classical English mystery entirely in contempt". What Chandler couldn't stomach were the gentleman amateur sleuths - especially the aristocratic ones, like Dorothy Sayers' Lord Peter Wimsey, who thanks to their inherited money and titles have ample time to lend a helping hand to the (not always utterly) clueless coppers. I didn't know that Chandler was half English himself, was English public-schooled, obviously knew the cricket-playing types there (and seems not to have liked them). The father of the genteel breed of amateur sleuths was of course Sayers' Lord Wimsey, and Sayers' esteemed novel "Gaudy Night" (which I liked, but 200 pages off the 500 wouldn't have hurt the book and strained my eyes less) is a prime example of the "Golden Age of British Crime Fiction". I had to LOL reading Chandler's verdict: "God, what sycophantic drivel. A whole clutch of lady dons at an Oxford college all in a flutter to know about Lord Peter Wimsey (...) How silly can you get?" Well, Hercule Poirot was at least a policeman once before WW I forced the "little Belgian" over the Channel. But the mannerisms of Poirot probably also produced literary nausea in Chandler - he was just against garnishing mystery stories "with chichi and glamour". And he seems to have been convinced that clever puzzle plotting AND a good narrative style excluded one another... Interesting points. (I personally think that Dorothy Sayers is stylistically better and plot-wise weaker than Agatha Christie and somehow manages to combine so-so puzzles with a verve for narrative.) Anyway, your post helped me "escape from the rhythm of my private thoughts", thank you! Here's the link to the article: https://crimereads.com/raymond-chandlers-grudge-against-british-mysteries-reconsidered/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I don't see Chandler as being an Anglophobe so much as severely allergic to anything he perceived as being cutesy or contrived or glossed-over.

      He grew up in Britain and seemed to feel rather more at home there than in the US. Though I suspect being half-American made him feel like an outsider in England, and being raised in England made him feel like an outsider in America.

      Anyway, thanks for the link! Interesting article.

      Delete
  3. Really enjoyed your write-up! It's been years since I read The Big Sleep, but I mainly remember falling in love with Chandler's metaphors. Your article reminds me of how good they are. I'm no big fan of detectives and mysteries as a rule, but I am a Chandler fan, and that's for sure.

    Karen

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Karen! I'm so glad you enjoyed this. Yes, Chandler's metaphorical descriptions are unparalleled delights <3

      Delete

Agree or disagree? That is the question...

Comments on old posts are always welcome! Posts older than 7 days are on moderation to dissuade spambots, so if your comment doesn't show up right away, don't worry -- it will once I approve it.

(Rudeness and vulgar language will not be tolerated.)